Brooke v. Patel ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 THERESA BROOKE, Case No.20-cv-02758-NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL 13 Re: Dkt. No. 9 5 PRAFUL C. PATEL, «414 Defendant. 15 16 7 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that Z 18 no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 |! action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 |! Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 || Dated: August 17, 2020 hee—~ 7 28 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge