Johnson v. Essex Fox Plaza, L.P. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 18-cv-06843-AGT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE STATUS REPORT v. 11 12 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant. 13 14 15 On June 20, 2019, the Court granted plaintiff Scott Johnson’s unopposed motion to stay 16 this case pending resolution of two similar cases on appeal before the Ninth Circuit. In the order 17 staying the case, the Court instructed that “[w]ithin 14 days of a resolution of the appeals in 3:17- 18 cv-02454-WHA and 8:18-cv-01615-DOC-DFM, the parties shall submit a Joint Status Report 19 reporting all issues, if any, remaining in this matter.” ECF No. 27 at 1. 20 On June 17, 2020, the Ninth Circuit issued decisions in both cases affirming the district 21 courts’ grants of summary judgment in favor of defendants. See Johnson v. Blackhawk Centercal, 22 LLC et al., No. 17-cv-02454-WHA, 2019 WL 1427435 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2019), aff’d sub nom. 23 Johnson v. Starbucks Corp., No. 19-15759, 2020 WL 3265063 (9th Cir. June 17, 2020); Kong v. 24 Mana Inv. Co., LLC, No. 18-cv-01615-DOC-DFM, 2019 WL 3220027 (C.D. Cal. May 1, 2019), 25 aff’d, No. 19-55577, 2020 WL 3265179 (9th Cir. June 17, 2020). The dockets also indicate that 26 the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate in each case on August 5, 2020. More than 14 days have 27 passed since then and the parties have not filed a joint status report. The parties are thus out of ] By Friday, September 4, 2020, the parties must file a joint report, in which they 2 |} summarize what issues, if any, remain in this matter. Failure to comply with this order may be 3 grounds for monetary sanctions, dismissal, entry of judgment, or other appropriate sanctions. 4 IT ISSO ORDERED. 5 || Dated: August 27, 2020 6 7 “TSE 8 United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 1] 13 «4 Oo 15 16 17 Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28