Che v. GFROERER, A California limited partnership ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 NGOC LAM CHE, Case No. 19-cv-06891-VKD 9 Plaintiff, SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 10 v. WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 11 GFROERER, Defendant. 13 v 14 Plaintiff Ngoc Lam Che filed the present action on October 23, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. O 15 ||} Pursuant to General Order 56 and the Court’s April 13, 2020 order, the parties’ last day to conduct Q 16 || joint site inspection was July 5, 2020 and plaintiff's last day to file a notice of need for 17 || mediation was August 17, 2020. Dkt. No. 18. Plaintiff did not file a notice of need for mediation, 18 || nordid plaintiff seek relief from the August 17 deadline. 19 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the 20 || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 21 (1962). Plaintiff is directed to file a written response to this order by August 31, 2020 and to 22 || appear before the Court on September 8, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. and show cause why this action 23 should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: August 24, 2020 26 . 28 □ 27 VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI 28 United States Magistrate Judge