Nye County v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC., NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE CONSULTANT LITIGATION MDL No. 2996 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —32) On June 7, 2021, the Panel transferred 17 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 543 F.Supp.3d 1377 (J.P.M.L. 2021). Since that time, 114 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Breyer. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of June 7, 2021, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the LL stay is lifted. □ = Nov 04, 2022 : ( OruNTeD Somes John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel I hereby certify that the annexed instrument isa true and correct copy of the original on file-in my office. ATTEST: MARK B. BUSBY Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California by: Chialh C eosin _11704/2022 IN RE: MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC., NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE CONSULTANT LITIGATION MDL No. 2996 SCHEDULE CTO-32 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION NEBRASKA NE 8 29-00356 City of South Sioux City, Nebraska et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. NEVADA NV 2 22-01779 Nye County v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN NCE 4 29-00129 Beaufort County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. NORTH CAROLINA MIDDLE _ CASWELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al v. NCM ! 22-0904 MCKINSEY AND COMPANY, INC. NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN NCW 5 29-00155 Alleghany County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc. PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN _ CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. MCKINSEY AND PAE 2 2204004 COMPANY, INC. VIRGINIA WESTERN VAW 4 29-00118 ety of Danville, Virginia et al v. McKinsey and Company,

Document Info

Docket Number: 3:22-cv-07699-CRB

Filed Date: 12/5/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024