Brooke v. Woodside Hotel Group LTD ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 20-cv-05821-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO 10 Vv. DISTRICT JUDGE 11 WOODSIDE HOTEL GROUP LTD, 2 Defendant. 13 14 Defendant Woodside Hotel Group Ltd. (“Woodside”) has moved to dismiss plaintiff 3 15 || Theresa Brooke’s complaint. Dkt. No. 7. None of the parties have consented to proceed before a a 16 || magistrate judge. Absent the consent of all parties, this Court does not have jurisdiction over this 3 17 matter and must refer the case to a district judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636; Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500 18 (9th Cir. 2017); see also Civ. L.R. 73-1(a){2). 19 Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be reassigned to a district judge. All pending 20 || motion hearings and scheduled appearances are hereby vacated and will be reset by the newly 21 assigned judge. Should all parties consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, this case may be 22 || reassigned back to the undersigned magistrate judge. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 || Dated: September 21, 2020 25 7 VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI United States Magistrate Judge 28