Hicks v. Wong ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL HICKS, Case No. 22-cv-08663-JD 8 Plaintiff, 9 y. ORDER RE DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 2 10 BAO WONG, et al., ll Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action. Court records indicate that 14 || plaintiff already proceeds with a case in this Court concerning similar claims. See Hicks □□□ Dr. 3 15 Yeah, Case No. 22-cv-6865 JD. This case is dismissed as duplicative. See Adams vy. Cal. Dept. of a 16 || Health Services, 487 F.3d 684, 688 (9th Cir. 2007). Plaintiff should proceed with all of his claims 3 17 || in the earlier filed case. S 18 For the foregoing reasons, this case is DISMISSED as duplicative. The pending motion 19 || (Dkt. No. 2) is VACATED. No fee is due. The Clerk is requested to close this case. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: December 16, 2022 22 23 JAMES D#MATO 24 United Stf{tes District Judge 25 26 27 28