- Bees a? DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT ARKANSAS Sep 14, 2020 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION By: Jake Kornegay D.C. DEP CLERK IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —233) On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,030 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. if = Sep 14, 2020 ( OrOMED STATES I hereby certify that the annexed John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION i strument is a true and correct copy Clerk of the Panel of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California Date: 9/f475020 IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741 SCHEDULE CTO−233 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ARIZONA AZ 4 20−00325 Silvas v. Monsanto Company ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 3 20−00260 Imboden et al v. Monsanto Company Corporation ARKANSAS WESTERN ARW 1 20−01044 Reaves v. Monsanto Company et al CONNECTICUT CT 3 20−01240 Donaghy v. Monsanto Company FLORIDA SOUTHERN FLS 9 20−81358 Tejera v. Monsanto Company LOUISIANA EASTERN LAE 2 20−02395 Clark v. Monsanto Company NEW YORK EASTERN NYE 2 20−02712 Grillo v. Monsanto Company et. al. NYE 2 20−03662 Menarchem v. Monsanto Company NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 1 20−06638 Richards v. Monsanto Company NYS 1 20−06642 Smith et al v. Monsanto Company OHIO SOUTHERN PAE 2 20−04038 BOWEN v. MONSANTO COMPANY WASHINGTON WESTERN WAW 3 20−05864 Kooi v. Monsanto Company
Document Info
Docket Number: 3:20-cv-06603
Filed Date: 9/14/2020
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/20/2024