Bennett v. Prop. 47 Public Defenders Deaprtment ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BENNETT, 11 Case No. 19-08166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. RECONSIDERATION IN PART; 13 REFERRING MATTER TO FEDERAL PRO SE PROGRAM FOR 14 PROP. 47 PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., LIMITED APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 15 Defendants. 16 (Docket No. 15) 17 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking money damages for unlawful confinement. Dkt. No. 1. The 20 Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, for Plaintiff to provide proof that a 21 conviction has been invalidated and therefore not barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 22 477 (1994). Dkt. No. 7. When Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint in the time 23 provided, the Court dismissed the action. Dkt. No. 9. The Court later granted Plaintiff’s 24 motion for reconsideration of the dismissal and reopened the matter. Dkt. No. 14. In the 25 same order, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief against Butte County 26 Jail and for appointment of counsel or a guardian ad litem pursuant to Federal Rule of 27 1 Plaintiff has filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s denial of appointment 2 counsel and injunctive relief, and also requests an extension of time to file an amended 3 complaint. Dkt. No. 15. Plaintiff asserts that he has been found incompetent to stand trial, 4 and provides a copy of an order issued by Superior Court of Butte County on July 20, 5 2020, stating that Plaintiff is to be committed to the Department of State Hospitals and 6 alternative a jail based competency treatment program. Id. at 3-4, 12. The Court finds 7 that this document raises a “substantial question” regarding Plaintiff’s mental 8 incompetence and therefore triggers the court’s duty of inquiry under Rule 17(c). See 9 Allen v. Calderon, 408 F.3d 1150, 1153 (9th Cir. 2005); see also Powell v. Symons, 680 10 F.3d 301, 307 (3d Cir. 2012); Ferrelli v. River Manor Health Care Center, 323 F.3d 196, 11 203 (2d Cir. 2003). 12 The Court will refer the matter for appointment of counsel for the limited purpose 13 of representing Plaintiff in connection with proceedings to determine whether to appoint a 14 conservator/guardian ad litem to represent him pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 17. Once the Court resolves whether a conservator/guardian ad litem should be appointed, 16 the Court will then decide whether to refer the action to the Federal Pro Se Program to find 17 counsel for the remainder of the action. 18 Plaintiff also moves for reconsideration of the Court’s denial of injunctive relief 19 against Butte County Jail. Dkt. No. 15 at 7. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to 20 injunctive relief because he has tested positive for COVID-19 and his life is in danger. Id. 21 But as the Court explained in its previous order, Plaintiff is attempting to assert new claims 22 against new Defendants which are unrelated to the underlying claim in this action. Dkt. 23 No. 14 at 2. He must file a separate action to challenge conditions of confinement at the 24 Butte County Jail as such relief is beyond the scope of this action.1 Accordingly, the 25 motion for reconsideration in this regard is DENIED. 26 1 CONCLUSION 2 For the foregoing reasons, the Court orders as follows: 3 1. This matter is referred to Kevin Knestrick of the Federal Pro Se Program to 4 || find counsel for the limited purpose discussed above. Upon an attorney being located to 5 || represent Plaintiff, that attorney shall be appointed as counsel for Plaintiff in this action for 6 || the limited purpose of representing Plaintiff in connection with proceedings to 7 || determine whether to appoint a conservator/guardian ad litem to represent him 8 || pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17, unless the attorney volunteers 9 otherwise. 10 2. The Clerk shall forward to the Federal Pro Se Program: (1) a copy of this 11 || order, (2) a copy of the docket sheet, and (3) a copy of the operative complaint and 2 relevant court orders. 5 13 3. All proceedings in this action are stayed until further notice. As such, S 14 || Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint is DENIED as 15 || moot. The Court will set a new schedule once the state of Plaintiff’s competency has been z 16 || determined. 5 17 4. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of injunctive relief against 18 Butte County Jail is DENIED. 19 This order terminates Docket No. 15. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED 21 || Dated: _October 7, 2020. fede Lye frceases/ BETH LABSON FREEMAN 22 United States District Judge 23 24 25 || □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ ster psp 26 27