McGinnis v. Davis ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARCUS G. MCGINNIS, Case No. 20-cv-01695-SI 8 Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE AND PARTIAL 9 v. DISMISSAL 10 RON DAVIS, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 A. Procedural History 14 Marcus McGinnis, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action 15 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, about prison officials’ responses to his requests for dental care and medical 16 complications that later arose. The court determined that, liberally construed, the complaint stated 17 a claim against defendants Dr. Earl Jones and nurse Salonga for deliberate indifference to McGinnis’ 18 dental/medical needs, but did not state a claim against the six other listed defendants. Docket No. 19 10 at 5. The court granted leave for plaintiff to file an amended complaint by September 4, 2020, 20 to attempt to state a claim against those six defendants. Id. The court explained: “If plaintiff does 21 not file an amended complaint, all defendants other than Dr. Jones and nurse Salonga will be 22 dismissed and the action will go forward against those two defendants with the complaint being the 23 operative pleading.” Id. at 8. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint and the deadline to do so 24 has passed. Accordingly, the case will move forward against only Dr. Jones and nurse Salonga. 25 26 27 1 B. Service and Scheduling 2 1. Liberally construed, the complaint states a cognizable § 1983 claim against Dr. Jones 3 and nurse Salonga for deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s dental/medical needs. All other claims 4 and defendants are dismissed. 5 2. The clerk shall issue a summons and the United States Marshal shall serve, without 6 prepayment of fees, the summons, and a copy of the complaint, the order of dismissal with leave to 7 amend (Docket No. 10), and this order upon the following two people on the dental/medical staff at 8 San Quentin State Prison: 9 - Dr. Earl Jones (dentist) 10 - Pierre Salonga (registered nurse) 11 3. In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the following briefing schedule for 12 dispositive motions is set: 13 a. No later than January 15, 2021, defendants must file and serve a motion for 14 summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot 15 be resolved by summary judgment, defendants must so inform the court prior to the date the motion 16 is due. If defendants file a motion for summary judgment, defendants must provide to plaintiff a 17 new Rand notice regarding summary judgment procedures at the time they file such a motion. 18 See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 2012). 19 b. Plaintiff's opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion 20 must be filed with the court and served upon defendants no later than February 26, 2021. Plaintiff 21 must bear in mind the notice and warning regarding summary judgment provided later in this order 22 as he prepares his opposition to any motion for summary judgment. 23 c. If defendants wish to file a reply brief, the reply brief must be filed and served 24 no later than March 19, 2021. 25 4. Plaintiff is provided the following notices and warnings about the procedures for 26 motions for summary judgment: 27 The defendants may make a motion for summary judgment by which they seek to have your Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. . . . Rule 56 tells you what you must do in 1 order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be 2 granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact -- that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary 3 judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by 4 declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to 5 interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the 6 facts shown in the defendants' declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition, 7 summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 8 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998). 9 If a defendant files a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, 10 he is seeking to have the case dismissed. As with other defense summary judgment motions, if a 11 motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is granted, the 12 plaintiff's case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. 13 5. All communications by plaintiff with the court must be served on a defendant's 14 counsel by mailing a true copy of the document to defendant's counsel. The court may disregard 15 any document which a party files but fails to send a copy of to his opponent. Until a defendant's 16 counsel has been designated, plaintiff may mail a true copy of the document directly to defendant, 17 but once a defendant is represented by counsel, all documents must be mailed to counsel rather than 18 directly to that defendant. 19 6. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 20 No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16 is required 21 before the parties may conduct discovery. 22 7. Plaintiff is responsible for prosecuting this case. Plaintiff must promptly keep the 23 court informed of any change of address and must comply with the court's orders in a timely fashion. 24 Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal 25 Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff must file a notice of change of address in every pending 26 case every time he is moved to a new facility. 27 1 8. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must include the case name and case number for this 2 || case on any document he submits to this court for consideration in this case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 || Dated: October 20, 2020 Sate WU tee 5 SUSAN ILLSTON 6 United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 © 15 16 = 17 Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 3:20-cv-01695

Filed Date: 10/20/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024