Rao v. Target Corporation ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CHITTARANJAN RAO, Case NO: 5:23-cv-02337 NC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 10 y DISMISSAL 11 Dkt. No. 29 19 TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. 13 = 14 15 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that GQ 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 5 17 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 18 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed by February 8, 2024. All scheduled dates are 20 || VACATED. 21 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case with termination date of February 8, 22 || 2024. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: December 13, 2023 h-_———— _ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 26 United States Magistrate Judge 27 28