Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson ( 2019 )

WILY INU. 2CIVU MVUUIEIGIE Fle bea TOMY eS MI UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -175) On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,522 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Wolfson. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. FOR THE PANEL: closes ) □□□ cone John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel J HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my_offi UNITED STATES DISTRICT CGURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERS WILLIAM T. es —— By << WPOAOW VIZ IW. Gi wh bw WTI or Pe DO odeN Oe poy. a wi uf IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738 SCHEDULE CTO-175 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO, CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 19-08331 Teresa Y. Castillo v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08337 Arnold Ossen v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08502 Lynda Garcia v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19—-08508 Sandra Van Haasen v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08515 Arlene E. Hein et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19—-08520 Janette Swiney v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 8 19-01885 Audrey L. Brunier v. Johnson and Johnson et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 19-01968 Roy Jackson, Jr. v. Johnson & Johnson, et al CAE 2 19-01990 LaBeaux et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAE 2 19-01991 Andreotti v. Johnson & Johnson, et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 4 19-06240 Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06301 Fox et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS 3 19-01899 Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAS 3 19-01912 Stein v. Johnson & Johnson et al NEW YORK EASTERN NYE 1 19-05430 Fusaro v. Johnson & Johnson et. al. NYE 2 19-05415 Alborano v. Johnson & Johnson et. al. NYE 2 19-05418 McShea et. al. v. Johnson & Johnson et. al. NEW YORK NORTHERN NYN 6 19-01166 Levesque v. Johnson & Johnson et al NEW YORK SOUTHERN NYS 1 19—08849 Sullivan v. Johnson & Johnson et al NORTH CAROLINA MIDDLE NCM 1 19-00993 DOUGLAS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al NCM 1 19-01016 CURRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al