Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 11cv1810 DMS (WVG) IN RE: AMERANTH PATENT 12 LITIGATION CASES, ORDER FOLLOWING STATUS 13 CONFERENCE 14 15 16 A telephonic status conference was held on December 2, 2021. After hearing from 17 counsel for the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 18 1. The stay imposed in the Court’s October 23, 2020 Order (ECF No. 1491) is lifted. 19 2. Consistent with In re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 20 1311-13 (Fed. Cir. 2011), and Nuance Communications, Inc. v. ABBYY USA Software 21 House, Inc., 813 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2016), Ameranth is ordered to show cause why it 22 should be allowed to reassert any claims that were not selected in response to the Court’s 23 February 14, 2017 Order. (See ECF No. 623) (directing Ameranth to select up to five 24 claims for assertion against each Defendant). Ameranth shall file its response to this order 25 on or before December 9, 2021. Defendants shall file an omnibus brief in response to 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 || Ameranth’s brief on or before December 16, 2021. The parties’ briefs on this issue shall 2 || be no more than fifteen (15) pages, respectively. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 ||Dated: December 2, 2021 em Dh 5 an Yn. Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, Chief Judge 6 United States District Court 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28