![]() |
All Courts |
![]() |
Federal Courts |
![]() |
Special Courts cases |
![]() |
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims |
![]() |
2004-05 |
-
ORDER
PER CURIAM: On November 3, 2003, the appellant, through counsel, filed a motion for an initial decision by the full Court. He argues that full-Court consideration is necessary because the appeal presents the opportunity to consider all aspects of the amendments to the Veterans Benefits Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-330, 116 Stat. 2820 (2002).
Motions for a full-Court decision are not favored. Ordinarily they will not be granted unless such action is necessary to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions or to resolve a question of exceptional importance. See U.S. Vet.App. R. 35(c). In this matter, the appellant has not shown that either basis exists to warrant a full-Court decision.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
*34 ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for an initial decision by the full Court is denied.
Document Info
Docket Number: 03-1014
Judges: Kramer, Farley, Ivers, Steinberg, Greene, Kasold, Hagel
Filed Date: 5/11/2004
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/16/2024