Anonymous , 1 N.C. 199 ( 1793 )


Menu:
  • Jones, J.

    concurred.

    Secondly, it was further objected against the prohibition, that the plaintiff is the Queen’s attorney there, and is bound to his *attendance, and therefore shall have his privilege.

    Per Curiam. He shall not have his privilege in this case, for he sues as executor.

    Jones, J. He shall not have his privilege omnino. Godb. 431.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 1 N.C. 199

Judges: Jones

Filed Date: 7/1/1793

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/17/2022