 |
All Courts |
 |
Federal Courts |
|
US Federal District Court Cases |
|
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of North Carolina |
|
1792-06 |
-
But
Patterson, J. took a distinction between the contract and remedy: and observed, that the contract remained the same notwithftanding this act: and that the remedy only was extended.
And Sitgreaves, J. accordante. A respondeas ouster was awarded.
Document Info
Citation Numbers： 1 N.C. 78, 18 F. Cas. 1067, 2 Mart. 78
Judges： Accordante, Patterson, Sitgreaves
Filed Date： 6/15/1792
Precedential Status： Precedential
Modified Date： 11/6/2024