United States v. Almany , 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 337 ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                                            Slip Op. 00 - 56
    UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
    ____________________________________
    :
    THE UNITED STATES,                  :
    :
    Plaintiff   :
    :
    v.                      :                     Before: MUSGRAVE, JUDGE
    :
    JOSEPH ALMANY, d/b/a J.A. IMPORTS, :                      Court No. 96-02-00384
    DAVID JORDAN, INC., and             :
    FAR WEST INSURANCE COMPANY,         :
    :
    Defendants. :
    ____________________________________:
    David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, Commercial
    Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice (A. David Lafer, Franklin E. White,
    Jr.), for plaintiff.
    Joseph Almany, defendant pro se.
    David K. Geren, Esquire, for defendant David Jordan, Inc.
    MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
    Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Judgment for Civil Penalties which
    reads as follows:
    In an order dated November 3, 1999, this Court granted the United States’ motion
    for clarification of the Court’s decision dated June 3, 1998, and held that defendants
    Joseph Almany d/b/a J.A. Imports and David Jordan, Inc. were liable to the United States
    for fraudulent violations of 
    19 U.S.C. § 1592
    . In that order, the Court ordered the parties
    to propose scheduling, jointly or separately, for determining the amount of the civil
    penalty. Plaintiff responds to the Court’s order and respectfully requests that the Court
    enter judgment against defendants Joseph Almany d/b/a J.A. Imports and David Jordan,
    Inc., and in favor of the United States, in the amount of $258,311.56 with post-judgment
    interest in the amount established by 
    28 U.S.C. § 1961
    (a) and (b)
    In the complaint, the United States requested that the Court enter judgment in
    favor of the United States for $413,138.00 for fraud penalties (or, in the alternative,
    $4,861,68 for gross negligence penalties, or $2,430.84 for negligence penalties), plus
    Court No. 96-02-00384                                                                                   Page 2
    interest, jointly and severally against defendants Joseph Almany d/b/a J.A. Imports and
    David Jordan, Inc. In addition, in accordance with 
    19 U.S.C. § 1592
    (d), we requested that
    the Court enter judgment in favor of the United States for $5,016.87, representing the lost
    customs duties, plus interest, jointly and severally, against all defendants in this case.
    In Slip Op. 98-72, dated June 3, 1998, this Court granted the Government’s
    motion for partial summary judgment upon liability and held that the defendants Joseph
    Almany d/b/a J.A. Imports and David Jordan, Inc., and Far West Insurance Company
    (“Far West”) were jointly and severally liable to the United States for the $5,016.87 in lost
    duties. In a separate order issued on the same day, this Court: (1) ordered defendant’s
    [sic] Joseph Almany and David Jordan, Inc. to pay to the United States $5,016.87 plus
    interest; (2) ordered the parties to schedule a trial for determining whether . . . Joseph
    Almany’s violations resulted from fraud, gross negligence, or negligence; (3) ordered that
    Joseph Almany indemnify and exonerate Far West from liability under its bond; and (4)
    removed Far West as a party from this case. The Court subsequently granted judgment
    in favor of Far West upon Far West’s cross-claims against defendant David Jordan, Inc.
    for indemnification for all or any portion of the bonded amount paid by Far West to the
    United States.[]
    Defendant’s Joseph Almany and David Jordan, Inc. have been determined by this
    Court to be jointly and severally liable for a fraud penalty as a result of violations of 
    19 U.S.C. § 1592
    (a) stated in the complaint. Pursuant to 
    19 U.S.C. § 1592
    (c)(1), the
    maximum penalty for fraudulent violations is a penalty which is the equivalent of the
    domestic value of the merchandise. As defendants have presented no reasons why the
    maximum penalty should not be imposed in this case, the Court should exercise its
    discretion to award the United states the maximum penalty permitted resulting from
    defendant Joseph Almany’s egregious “double invoicing” scheme. As is established in
    the attached declaration of Walter Sawelenko, Field National Import Specialist for
    watches and clocks, the domestic value of the merchandise entered by means of the 23
    entries at issue in this case has been determined to be $258,311.56. Accordingly, this
    Court should issue a judgment in favor of the United States against defendants, jointly and
    severally, ordering defendants Joseph Almany d/b/a J.A. Imports and David Jordan, Inc.
    to pay to the United States $258,311.56.
    Plaintiff’s Motion was filed April 17, 2000. As of May 22, 2000, neither defendant
    had responded. See CIT Rules 6(c) and 7(d). Defendants are hereby ordered to show cause why
    judgment should not be granted in favor of The United States of America by June 23, 2000.
    SO ORDERED.
    Court No. 96-02-00384                                         Page 3
    Dated: May 23, 2000         _______________________________________
    New York, New York           R. KENTON MUSGRAVE, JUDGE
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Court 96-02-00384

Citation Numbers: 2000 CIT 56, 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 337

Judges: Musgrave

Filed Date: 5/23/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2024