Elkem Metals Co. v. United States ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                             Slip Op. 05-109
    UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
    BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS
    ________________________________________
    :
    ELKEM METALS COMPANY and                :
    GLOBE METALLURGICAL INC.,               :
    :
    Plaintiffs,              :
    :
    v.                       :
    :
    UNITED STATES,                          :      Court No. 02-00232
    :
    Defendant,               :
    :
    and                      :
    :
    RIMA INDUSTRIAL S/A,                    :
    :
    Defendant-Intervenor.    :
    ________________________________________:
    JUDGMENT
    In Elkem Metals Co. v. United States, 28 CIT ___, 
    350 F. Supp. 2d 1270
     (2004), the Court remanded this matter to the United States
    Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) with instructions to include
    the value added tax (“VAT”), paid by Rima Industrial S/A (“Rima”)
    upon certain production inputs, in the recalculation of constructed
    value (“CV”) and make all necessary adjustments to the antidumping
    duty margin. See 
    id.
     at ___, 
    350 F. Supp. 2d at 1276
    . On March
    16, 2005, Commerce filed its Final Results of Redetermination
    Pursuant to Court Remand (“Remand Results”).        For its Remand
    Results, Commerce recalculated Rima’s CV to include the VAT paid by
    Rima on material inputs as supported by record evidence.
    Accordingly, Commerce recalculated Rima’s antidumping duty margin
    to reflect the inclusion of the VAT Rima paid. See Remand Results.
    Rima’s recalculated antidumping duty margin for the period July 1,
    1999, through June 30, 2000, was 0.48 percent. See 
    id.
    This Court, having received and reviewed Commerce’s Remand
    Results, comments of Plaintiffs, and comments of Defendant-
    Intervenors, holds that Commerce duly complied with the Court’s
    remand order and it is hereby
    Court No. 02-00232                                          Page 2
    ORDERED that Commerce’s Remand Results are reasonable,
    supported by substantial evidence, and otherwise in accordance with
    law; and it is further
    ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on March 16,
    2005, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further
    ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this
    case is dismissed.
    /s/ Nicholas Tsoucalas
    NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS
    SENIOR JUDGE
    Dated:    August 26, 2005
    New York, New York
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-00232

Filed Date: 8/26/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/25/2018