FAG Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States , 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 1238 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                          Slip Op. 01-131
    UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
    BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS
    ____________________________________
    :
    FAG KUGELFISCHER GEORG SCHAFER AG,    :
    FAG ITALIA S.p.A.,                    :
    BARDEN CORPORATION (U.K.) LTD.,       :
    FAG BEARINGS CORPORATION and          :
    THE BARDEN CORPORATION,               :
    :
    Plaintiffs,                 :
    :
    v.                          :    Court No. 99-08-00465
    :
    UNITED STATES,                        :
    :
    Defendant,                  :
    :
    THE TORRINGTON COMPANY,               :
    :
    Defendant-Intervenor.       :
    ____________________________________ :
    ORDER
    This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the decision of
    the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) in FAG
    Kugelfischer Georg Schafer AG v. United States, 
    263 F.3d 1369
     (Fed.
    Cir. 2001) and CAFC’s mandate of October 15, 2001, vacating and
    remanding the judgment of the Court in FAG Kugelfischer Georg
    Schafer AG v. United States, 
    2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 78
    , Slip
    Op. 00-80 (CIT July 7, 2000).
    Pursuant to said decision by CAFC, this Court hereby
    REMANDS this case to the Department of Commerce, International
    Trade Administration (“Commerce”) to: (1) provide a reasonable
    explanation of why Commerce uses different definitions of “foreign
    like product” for price purposes and when calculating constructed
    value; (2) explain the factual setting for the calculations at
    issue; (3) explain the actual methodology of the calculations made;
    and (4) explain why Commerce’s methodology for the calculations of
    constructed value profit comports with the statute, the definition
    of “foreign like product” contained in 
    19 U.S.C. § 1677
    (16), and
    particularly the definition in subsection (C); and it is hereby
    Court No. 99-08-00465                                         Page 2
    ORDERED that the remand results are due within ninety (90) days
    of the date that this order is entered. Any responses or comments
    are due within thirty (30) days thereafter. Any rebuttal comments
    are due within fifteen (15) days after the date the responses or
    comments are due.
    ________________________
    NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS
    SENIOR JUDGE
    Dated: November 15, 2001
    New York, New York
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Court 99-08-00465

Citation Numbers: 2001 CIT 131, 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 1238

Judges: Tsoucalas

Filed Date: 11/15/2001

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024