-
Per Curiam: This case involves the same question as that considered and decided in the foregoing case of Daniels v. Lewis, viz.: whether the prorate provisions of section 116 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the distribution of the proceeds in attachment cases, are operative under the code system of practice; and for the reasons expressed in the opinion in the said case of Daniels v. Lewis, the judgment of the court below in this case will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Document Info
Filed Date: 4/15/1884
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/3/2024