Onofrey v. Resnik , 100 Conn. 748 ( 1924 )

Per Curiam.

The evidence was conflicting and hence the determination by the jury of the issue of negligence and contributory negligence in favor of the defendants must stand unless we can say as matter of law that the jury’s conclusions were such that reasoning minds could not reasonably have reached them. We are clearly of the opinion that we would not be justified in so holding as matter of law.

There is no error.