Bilenkise v. Ferruccio , 98 Conn. 830 ( 1922 )

Per Curiam.

The defendant claims that the subordinate facts found by the trial court do not support its ultimate conclusion that the plaintiff at the time of the accident was in the exercise of due care. In our opinion this conclusion was not only amply justified by the subordinate facts, but was the only conclusion which could have been reasonably drawn from them.

There is no error.