Loubet v. Loubet ( 1967 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book §§ 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.

    There is no error.

Document Info

Filed Date: 6/8/1967

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2024