-
It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court for the judicial district of Waterbury with proper diligence, it is, under Prae
*695 tice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant on or before December 28, 1976, files his brief.Argued December 7 decided December 7, 1976 Michael J. Daly III, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Joseph A. Hill, assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 172 Conn. 694, 366 A.2d 804
Filed Date: 12/7/1976
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/3/2024