Kerpa v. A & A Bros. ( 1987 )

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s first, second and sixth claims of error were not raised in the trial court; consequently, we will not consider those claims. The plaintiff’s third, fourth and fifth elaims of error invoke the discretionary function of the court. Our review of the record, transcript and briefs fails to disclose any abuse of such discretion.

There is no error.