Damelio v. Anaconda, Inc. , 15 Conn. App. 805 ( 1988 )

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has attacked the factual findings of the workers’ compensation commissioner as affirmed by the compensation review division. We cannot say that the factual findings are clearly erroneous in view of the evidence and the whole record, or that the decision was otherwise erroneous in law. Practice Book § 4061.

There is no error.