-
Per Curiam. The result in this case is controlled by three prior decisions of this court: Shapiro v. Carothers, 23 Conn. App. 188, 579 A.2d 583 (1990); Senie v. Carothers, 22 Conn. App. 253, 576 A.2d 1312 (1990); and DelVecchio v. Department of Income Maintenance, 18 Conn. App. 13, 555 A.2d 1007 (1989).
*939 Despite the invitation by the plaintiff to revisit this issue, we decline to do so. Nothing in these cases convinces us that they were wrongfully decided, decided on the basis of a flawed analysis, or represent aberrant appellate decisions as claimed in the appellant’s brief.The judgment is affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: 10415
Citation Numbers: 26 Conn. App. 938, 600 A.2d 1390, 1992 Conn. App. LEXIS 28
Filed Date: 1/28/1992
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/3/2024