State v. Ellis , 36 Conn. App. 916 ( 1994 )

Per Curiam.

The defendant concedes that the jury instruction issues that he raises have been resolved adversely to his claims by our Supreme Court.¹ We are bound by those rulings. See Burton v. Planning Commission, 13 Conn. App. 400, 409, 536 A.2d 995 (1988), aff'd, 209 Conn. 609, 553 A.2d 161 (1989); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn. App. 302, 309 n.5, 523 A.2d 891, cert. denied, 204 Conn. 805, 528 A.2d 1152 (1987).

The judgment is affirmed.

1 This appeal was taken originally to the Supreme Court. Pursuant to Practice Book § 4023, the Supreme Court transferred the appeal to this court.