Bickart v. F. & F. Schaefer Brewing Co. , 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2 ( 1935 )


Menu:
  • FOSTER, J.

    To paraphrase the words of the Court in Dawson vs. Orange, 78 Conn. 96, 101, these allegations tend to put the defendant’s defenses more fully and plainly before the Court and it is within its rights, although not strictly necessary, to state them in that manner.

    The motion to expunge is denied.

Document Info

Docket Number: File #43019

Citation Numbers: 1 Conn. Supp. 3, 1935 Conn. Super. LEXIS 2

Filed Date: 1/21/1935

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024