Stratford v. Bridgeport, No. Cv 82-0204584 (Dec. 13, 1995) , 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 13976 ( 1995 )

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Both parties have urged the court to resolve this matter, which has been pending for over thirteen years,¹ based on the defendant's motion for summary judgment. However, the plaintiff, in its five-year old memorandum in opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment, argues that "whether the airport is being operated for the purpose of making a profit is a genuine issue of a material act. Therefore, summary judgment should not enter."

At this juncture, the plaintiff is correct. If the parties are truly desirous of a summary disposition in a case of this nature, they must submit either a stipulation of material factsor an agreed upon submission of documentary evidence, includingaffidavits. Otherwise, there must be a trial.

BY THE COURT

Bruce L. Levin

Judge of the Superior Court