-
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de MOTION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE (#123) AND MOTION TO REARGUE/MODIFY AND SET ASIDE JUDGMENT (#128) A hearing on the defendant's motion (#123) dated February 28, 1992 and on the plaintiff's motion for contempt (#125) dated March 18, 1992 was held before the undersigned who filed a memorandum of decision on June 24, 1992 deciding only the plaintiff's motion. Reference to said memorandum (#127) is made for the statement of facts, issues and the conclusions of the court.The defendant never brought a citation based on
46b-86 (b) Connecticut General Statutes to modify the alimony order but rather alleged "a significant and material change in the circumstances of the parties to warrant a termination or modification of the alimony award". A modification based on46b-86 (b) must be pleaded to put the other party on notice, Connolly v. Connolly,191 Conn. 468 , at473 et seq.The defendant's evidence came in without objection but did not prove ". . . a change of circumstances as to alter the financial seeds of. . ." the plaintiff, Kaplan v. Kaplan,
186 Conn. 387 .Motions (#123) and (#128) are each denied.
HARRIGAN, J. CT Page 6919
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 077652
Citation Numbers: 1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 6918
Judges: HARRIGAN, JUDGE
Filed Date: 7/22/1992
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021