Pasik v. United Technologies Corp., No. Cv94 31 33 96 S (Nov. 4, 1996) ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • [EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]ORDER RE: OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST TO REVISE Request No. 1. — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 2 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 3 — Delete phrase "by a headhunter agency."

    Request No. 4 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 5 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 6 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 7 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 8 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 9 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 10 — Specify the terms of the offer and the terms of the acceptance which are relevant.

    Request No. 11 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 12 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 13 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 14 — Objection overruled. CT Page 9478

    Request No. 15 — Specify the nature of the financial and personal increases.

    Request No. 16 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 17 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 18 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 19 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 20 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 21 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 22 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 23 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 24 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 25 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 26 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 27 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 28 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 29 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 30 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 31 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 32 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 33 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 34 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 35 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 36 — Objection sustained. CT Page 9479

    Request No. 37 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 38 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 39 — Objection overruled.

    Request No. 40 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 41 — Objection sustained.

    Request No. 42 — Objection overruled.

    THIM, JUDGE

Document Info

Docket Number: No. CV94 31 33 96 S

Judges: THIM, JUDGE.

Filed Date: 11/4/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021