-
Opinion by
Dallinger, J. The only witness was the examiner who passed the merchandise and who was called by the plaintiff. He testified that the merchandise was of the same character and description as that covered by T. D. 49082. The court was of the opinion that inhere-was nothing in the record which would warrant it in holding the merchandise dutiable under paragraph 304. The protest was therefore overruled.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 46409
Citation Numbers: 7 Cust. Ct. 283
Judges: Dallinger
Filed Date: 10/8/1941
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/9/2022