-
Opinion by
Walker, J. It appeared that the hats in question were a part of merchandise included in a previous season contract and were invoiced at the previous season price which, in the meantime, had advanced. From the record the court was satisfied that there was no intention of defrauding the revenue of the United States, concealing or misrepresenting the facts, or deceiving the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 49219
Citation Numbers: 12 Cust. Ct. 261
Judges: Walker
Filed Date: 2/25/1944
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/9/2022