Protest 90481-K of McMinn & Davis Co. , 13 Cust. Ct. 321 ( 1944 )

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the trial the examiner identified the articles as parts of polo mallets. As paragraph 1502 as modified provides for polo mallets, but not parts of such equipment, the protest was overruled, citing Huber v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 55, C. D. 793).