Protests 299922-G of Lord , 1 Cust. Ct. 540 ( 1938 )

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) bottles and atomizers were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.