Protests 382443-G of Butler Bros. , 1 Cust. Ct. 541 ( 1938 )

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), and Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373) the atomizers and thimbles in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.