Protests 730194-G of Lord , 1 Cust. Ct. 542 ( 1938 )

Opinion by

Dallingeb, J.

It was stipulated that the articles in question are chiefly used on the table and in the household for utilitarian purposes or hollow ware. The claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was therefore sustained. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Heemsoth v. United States (T. D. 49191) cited.