Protest 941301-G/87571 of Montgomery Ward & Co. (Chicago). , 3 Cust. Ct. 437 ( 1939 )

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Wolf (26 C. C. P. A. 243, C. A. D. 23) the microscope sets in question were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 228 (b) as claimed.