Protest 847678-G of E. H. Silberman Paper Co. , 3 Cust. Ct. 443 ( 1939 )

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

There was testimony that the merchandise in question was chiefly used for paper making. It was therefore held free of duty as paper stock under paragraph 1750 as claimed. United States v. Herrmann (154 Fed. 196, T. D. 27981) and Stern v. United States (2 Ct. Cust. Appls. 405. T. D. 32167) cited relative to the production of samples.