Protests 971619-G of E. Leitz, Inc. , 3 Cust. Ct. 460 ( 1939 )


Menu:
  • Opinion by

    Dallinger, J.

    On the agreed facts the cameras and parts in question were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1551. United States v. Leitz (24 C. C. P. A. 139, T. D. 48622) and United States v. Zeiss (id. 145, T. D. 48624) followed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 42571

Citation Numbers: 3 Cust. Ct. 460

Judges: Dallinger

Filed Date: 10/25/1939

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/20/2022