Di Mar Importing Co. v. United States , 40 Cust. Ct. 514 ( 1958 )


Menu:
  • Opinion by

    Oliver, C. J.

    In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 61800; protests 310255-K, etc. (New York)

Citation Numbers: 40 Cust. Ct. 514

Judges: Oliver

Filed Date: 4/10/1958

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/9/2022