Protest 803666-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co. , 5 Cust. Ct. 263 ( 1940 )

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120 C. D. 303) the Rockingham-ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.