American Precision Drawing Inst. Co. v. United States , 42 Cust. Ct. 599 ( 1959 )


Menu:
  • Lawrence, Judge:

    When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

    Rule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

    Tbe submission for decision of any case shall be made- in open court by tbe parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to tbe court, or by tbe court on its own motion. Where tbe plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or bis attorney, in a case does not appear when tbe same is called, and after tbe opposite party has bad opportunity to present evidence on tbe issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by tbe court on the record as it appears therein.

    Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

    Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Document Info

Docket Number: Reap. Dec. 9390; Entry No. 801099

Citation Numbers: 42 Cust. Ct. 599

Judges: Lawrence

Filed Date: 4/8/1959

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2024