Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United States , 45 Cust. Ct. 286 ( 1960 )


Menu:
  • Opinion by

    Ford, J.

    In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Empire Brushes, Inc., et al. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 64585; protests 317494-K(A), etc. (New York)

Citation Numbers: 45 Cust. Ct. 286

Judges: Ford

Filed Date: 9/27/1960

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2024