Irving W. Rice Co. v. United States , 59 Cust. Ct. 890 ( 1967 )

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of finished glass atomizer bases; that the merchandise in its imported condition possesses no independent function and is solely used when attached to and assembled with other substantial components thereby comprising a complete atomizer; and following the principles set forth in William Adams, Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 429, C.D. 2670), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.