In re: Tawana D. Shephard ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and
    Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors
    so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 15-BG-983
    IN RE: TAWANA D. SHEPHARD
    Respondent.
    Bar Registration No. 486834                              BDN: 179-15
    BEFORE:       Fisher, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Reid, Senior Judges.
    ORDER
    (FILED - December 17, 2015)
    On consideration of the certified opinion of the Court of Appeals of Maryland
    disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney
    Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Shephard, 
    119 A.3d 765
    (Md. 2015), this court’s
    September 21, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal
    discipline should not be imposed, the response of respondent, the statement of Bar
    Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed
    to file the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is
    ORDERED that Tawana D. Shephard is hereby disbarred from the practice of
    law in this jurisdiction. To the extent respondent challenges imposition of reciprocal
    discipline by attempting to re-litigate the discipline imposed by the state of Maryland,
    such a challenge is improper in reciprocal disciplinary proceedings, see In re
    Zdravkovich, 
    831 A.2d 964
    , 969 (D.C. 2003) (“Put simply, reciprocal discipline
    proceedings are not a forum to reargue the foreign discipline.”). Further, respondent
    failed to address in her response to the court’s order the additional findings that she
    had extensively engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in the state of Maryland
    and why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed based on that finding. It is
    FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period
    of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully
    complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).
    PER CURIAM
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-BG-983

Judges: Fisher, Nebeker, Per Curiam, Reid

Filed Date: 12/17/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/26/2024