Arnold v. District of Columbia , 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 161 ( 1960 )

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of “colliding” and of “leaving after colliding” in violation of the Traffic and Motor Vehicle Regulations. '

His contention on this appeal is that the court improperly limited his counsel in his cross-examination of the government’s witnesses.

We have carefully examined the record and cannot say there was any abuse of discretion in this connection.

Affirmed.