In re: Anthony McDaniel ( 2015 )

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and
Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors
so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
No. 15-BG-563
IN RE: ANTHONY MCDANIEL,
Respondent.
Bar Registration No. 976583 BDN: 140-15
BEFORE: Fisher, Associate Judge, and Newman and Farrell, Senior Judges.
ORDER
(FILED - August 27, 2015)
On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland
disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Attorney
Grievance Com’n of Maryland v. McDaniel, 114 A.3d 708 (Md. 2015), this court’s
June 17, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline
should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal
discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this
court’s order to show cause or the affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g),
it is
ORDERED that Anthony McDaniel is hereby disbarred from the practice of
law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In
re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical
reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).
It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s period
of disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully
complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g).
PER CURIAM