In re Douglas A. Kuber , 185 A.3d 723 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
    Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the
    Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound
    volumes go to press.
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 17-BG-691
    IN RE DOUGLAS A. KUBER, RESPONDENT.
    A Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
    (Bar Registration No. 423238)
    On Report and Recommendation
    Of the Board on Professional Responsibility
    (DDN 98-17)
    (Decided June 7, 2018)
    Before FISHER and BECKWITH, Associate Judges, and FARRELL, Senior
    Judge.
    PER CURIAM: In this case, the Board on Professional Responsibility has
    recommended that respondent Douglas Kuber be disbarred from the practice of law
    after he pled guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, a crime of moral turpitude.
    Neither respondent nor Disciplinary Counsel filed any exceptions to the Board’s
    report. However, in response to a previously imposed suspension pursuant to D.C.
    Bar R. XI § 10 (c), respondent filed his D.C. Bar R. XI § 14 (g) affidavit on August
    7, 2017.
    2
    Under D.C. Bar R. XI § 9 (h)(2), “if no exceptions are filed to the Board’s
    report, the [c]ourt will enter an order imposing the discipline recommended by the
    Board upon the expiration of the time permitted for filing exceptions.” See also In
    re Viehe, 
    762 A.2d 542
    , 543 (D.C. 2000) (“When . . . there are no exceptions to the
    Board’s report and recommendation, our deferential standard of review becomes
    even more deferential.”). We have previously held that both mail and wire fraud
    are per se crimes of moral turpitude. See, e.g., In re Bryant, 
    46 A.3d 402
    (D.C.
    2012). We have further held that a conviction for conspiracy to commit a crime of
    moral turpitude is a crime of moral turpitude. See, e.g., In re Lickstein, 
    972 A.2d 314
    , 316 (D.C. 2009). In this case, because respondent has been convicted of a
    crime of moral turpitude, the appropriate sanction is to disbar him from the
    practice of law. See In re Colson, 
    412 A.2d 1160
    , 1165 (D.C. 1979) (en banc).
    Accordingly, it is
    ORDERED that Douglas A. Kuber is hereby disbarred from the practice of
    law, nunc pro tunc to August 7, 2017.
    So ordered.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-BG-691

Citation Numbers: 185 A.3d 723

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/7/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024