In re Reich ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic
    and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of
    any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go
    to press.
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 16-BG-464
    IN RE STEPHANIE G. REICH, RESPONDENT.
    A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
    (Bar Registration No. 473039)
    On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional
    Responsibility Ad Hoc Hearing Committee
    Approving Petition for Negotiated Discipline
    (BDN 241-15)
    (Decided: September 10, 2020)
    Before THOMPSON and DEAHL, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge
    PER CURIAM: This decision is non-precedential. Please refer to D.C. Bar R.
    XI, § 12.1(d) regarding the appropriate citation of this opinion.
    In this disciplinary matter, the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee (the Committee)
    recommends approval of a petition for negotiated attorney discipline. See D.C. Bar
    R. XI, § 12.1(c). The petition is based on the finding that Respondent’s conviction
    for making a false statement to obtain unemployment compensation did not
    constitute moral turpitude per se.   The Committee found that “circumstances in
    2
    which Respondent found herself [a “volunteer” for the Gray campaign who was paid
    a stipend] may not have been employment at all” within the meaning of the
    unemployment compensation statute. 1
    Respondent acknowledged that she committed a misdemeanor crime in
    violation of D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct 8.4(b) and 8.4(c). The proposed
    discipline is a three-year suspension without a fitness requirement nunc pro tunc to
    July 5, 2016, the date she filed her D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.
    Having reviewed the Committee’s recommendation in accordance with our
    procedures in uncontested disciplinary cases, see D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1(d), we agree
    this case is appropriate for negotiated discipline and the proposed disposition is not
    unduly lenient or inconsistent with dispositions imposed for comparable
    professional misconduct. Accordingly, it is
    ORDERED that Respondent Stephanie G. Reich is hereby suspended from
    the practice of law for three years, nunc pro tunc to July 5, 2016, the date on which
    Respondent filed a compliant D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit with this court.
    1
    Report and Recommendation of the Ad Hoc Hearing Committee at 15.
    3
    So ordered.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-BG-464

Filed Date: 9/10/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/10/2020